Search

Chad Bemis

Orting, WA
4.0C year-end 2024
63 matches · 33W–30L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.66
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 3.5
98%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
445 of 782

Chad is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chad has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0201920212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chad has gone from the 43rd to the 10th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
50.9%
27W–26L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
L
Alejandro Henao / Nathan Frederickson
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with ISAMU KIBE
0.041below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with ISAMU KIBE
0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Minh Nguyen / Quoc Nguyen
2026-01-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Alcantara
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Carl Toews / McKee Buxton
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Alcantara
0.040below expectation — took 50% of games against 66% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Vichet Hoy / Jeff Pearson
2024-06-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Martin
+0.017about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Malayaz Sachdeva / Scott Styer
2024-05-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Martin
+0.040better than expected — took 47% of games against 35% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Kim
0.050below expectation — took 33% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Devin Huff / Nathan Wolch
2024-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Schneider
+0.043better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2024-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Kim
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2024-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Martin
0.062below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Johan An / Mark Hayter
2024-04-06 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Martin
+0.003about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-19 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kenji Yoshino
0.008below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.