Search

Kim Larson

BUCKLEY, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
91 matches · 41W–50L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
488 of 782

Kim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192021202220242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kim has gone from the 69th to the 48th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
56%
14W–11L · 51.6% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
8.0
55%
11W–9L · 53.6% of games
9.0
25%
3W–9L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Peyton
+0.015better than expected — took 52% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
+0.003about as expected — took 32% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
David Garratt / Michael Williams
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lindberg
0.057below expectation — took 8% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Addison
+0.009about as expected — took 29% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Joel Peyton / Chris Dewald
2026-04-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Taylor
0.051below expectation — took 29% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Kelly Carolus / Mike McDermott
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Lusk
0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Rik Radecki / David Ralph
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
0.018below expectation — took 47% of games against 55% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Matthew Sheets / David Campana
2026-02-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
+0.005about as expected — took 58% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
0.031below expectation — took 56% of games against 66% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
Young Han / Kelly Carolus
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
0.054below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Steven Bell / James Childs
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
+0.009better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.