← Search

Kim Larson

BUCKLEY, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
91 matches · 41W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history91 matches
W
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joel Peyton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · LRC-Huffman · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-07 · LRC-Huffman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lindberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-11 · LRC-Huffman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Addison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-27 · SWW-GTC-Boling · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · LRC-Triquart · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Lusk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-22 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-15 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-08 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-01-25 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-04 · LRC-Triquart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
56%
14W–11L · 51.6% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 48.1% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.3% of games
8.0
55%
11W–9L · 53.6% of games
9.0
25%
3W–9L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams