Search

John Shelton

Lakewood, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
153 matches · 100W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.63
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
5%
down to 3.5
95%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lakewood · 4.0
4 of 5
WA · 4.0
493 of 782

John is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

John has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, John has gone from the 89th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
66.7%
28W–14L · 56.1% of games
7.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 56.2% of games
8.0
75.6%
34W–11L · 60.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history153 matches
L
Craig Fager / Guy Schneiderchamps
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Leonard Bauer
+0.028better than expected — took 50% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Gerald Nelson
0.029below expectation — took 63% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Drake Nicholson
0.001about as expected — took 59% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Buddy Olson / David Casebier
2026-06-05 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Taylor
0.044below expectation — took 50% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kurt Bethman
0.009about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Taylor
0.020below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Taylor
+0.048better than expected — took 92% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Terry Wright / Rick Johnson
2026-04-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Taylor
+0.045better than expected — took 80% of games against 55% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Kadoshima
0.021below expectation — took 42% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Matthew Sheets / McKee Buxton
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aris Rosario
0.009about as expected — took 62% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Danny Severns / Cleo Ravanera
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Peter Lusk
0.022below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Boggess
0.038below expectation — took 37% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.