← Search

Cleo Ravanera

MILTON, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
35 matches · 14W–21L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.30
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.5
603 of 1364

Cleo is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Cleo has been a steady 3.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

3.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Cleo has gone from the 47th to the 38th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 49.1% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 31.9% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 50.9% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Malisa Munoz
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
Mark Youngberg / Chris Cuevas
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danny Severns
−0.035below expectation — took 47% of games against 63% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Brad Byron / David Smith
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Russ Holsen
−0.002about as expected — took 48% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Eli Baratz / Sonny Ko
2026-02-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Oliver Alcantara
−0.016below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephen Hewitt
−0.018below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Danny Severns
+0.017about as expected — took 41% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-01-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Chapin
−0.008about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Chapin
−0.036below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tashi Schmidt
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
−0.006better than expected — took 80% of games against 72% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Brianna Arboine / Nolan Edwardsmixed
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clare Cadiz
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Bryce Brooks / April Korshinchamps
2025-07-12 · #1 Doubles · with Jullie Seeley
+0.080better than expected — took 92% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.