Search

Ronald Beresky

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
53 matches · 24W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.01
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
43%
down to 4.0
57%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 25% down · 75% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.05. Higher than today’s 4.01 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.5
11 of 17
WA · 4.5
236 of 364

Ronald is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ronald has been a steady 4.5 across all 3 seasons on record.

4.04.5201920202022

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
50%
6W–6L · 55.2% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.9% of games
9.0
55%
11W–9L · 49.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history53 matches
L
Kevin Jones / Rob Knoxchamps
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Steven Dagg
0.037below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Tim Larson
0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Laskowski
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clemente Villalobos
0.039below expectation — took 32% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pete Addison
0.013below expectation — took 37% of games against 44% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Darrel Leimback / Kevin Acuff
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Lindberg
0.022below expectation — took 25% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
David Doud / William Wagner
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kevin Bay
0.024below expectation — took 50% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
David Doud / Todd Battison
2025-09-14 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Steven Dagg
+0.005about as expected — took 48% of games against 47% expected
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
David Robin / Duke Dixonchamps
2025-06-22 · #1 Doubles · with Steven Dagg
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
5-2
W
Robert Schefter / Mark Villegaschamps
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Kevin Bay
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Elefson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eric Elefson
not counted — an opponent has no rating on record
6-2, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.