Search

William Wagner

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
62 matches · 36W–26L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
63%
stay 4.0
37%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Lower than today’s 3.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
12 of 186
WA · 4.0
22 of 782

William is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

William has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5201920202021202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 46.1% of games
8.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 63.5% of games
9.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.9% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Stephen Rosen
+0.020better than expected — took 68% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Stephen Rosen
0.013about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Tim Qualls / Tom Timpermanchamps
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Stephen Rosen
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Kevin Acuff / Jorge Adamicskachamps
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Stephen Rosen
+0.006better than expected — took 65% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
PATRICK TAK / Jay Squirechamps
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with William Hall
0.037below expectation — took 37% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
David Jacobsen / Kevin McCarthy
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hall
0.002about as expected — took 67% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hall
+0.008better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Charles Hodge / Florian Purganan
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Meacham
0.001about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-01-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Russin
+0.044better than expected — took 61% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Battison
0.034below expectation — took 45% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Allan Johnson
+0.049better than expected — took 75% of games against 49% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-12-06 · #3 Doubles · with Stephen Rosen
+0.017better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.