Search

Chris Scalzo

Bellevue, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
66 matches · 46W–20L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.54
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 6 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
29%
down to 3.5
71%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 17% down · 83% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.57. Higher than today’s 3.54 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 4.0
68 of 76
WA · 4.0
667 of 782

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.0202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chris has gone from the 90th to the 65th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
74.4%
32W–11L · 56.4% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
0.026below expectation — took 38% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Craig Fager / Glen Satrechamps
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
+0.048better than expected — took 80% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
Michael Williams / Jeff Englechamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
0.028below expectation — took 56% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
0.007about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
Ramesh Ganesh / Cameron Buck
2025-09-20 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Wagner
+0.007better than expected — took 80% of games against 68% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2025-09-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Wagner
+0.026better than expected — took 67% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Joe Potter / Merrick Firestonechamps
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
0.001about as expected — took 46% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
0.021below expectation — took 56% of games against 63% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Jeff Blackburn
0.008about as expected — took 54% of games against 57% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-06-15 · #3 Doubles · with Jacob Scalzo
0.041below expectation — took 8% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Jianjun Zhu / Tianyou Liu
2025-05-23 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeff Blackburn
0.042below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Jeffrey Duan / Ryan Hung
2025-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacob Scalzo
+0.013better than expected — took 54% of games against 49% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.