← Search

Jorge Adamicska

Olympia, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
66 matches · 23W–43L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
20%
down to 4.0
80%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 12% down · 88% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.09. Higher than today’s 4.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Olympia · 4.5
5 of 8
WA · 4.5
211 of 364

Jorge is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jorge has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jorge has gone from the 40th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
38.6%
17W–27L · 46.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.4% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 45.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Jerry Saul
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Acuff
−0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 40% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Eli Baratz / David White
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Flores
−0.059below expectation — took 52% of games against 69% expected
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Flores
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jaime Chaves / Brendan Manuel Nadayag
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kevin Andry
+0.012about as expected — took 53% of games against 48% expected
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Andreas Ohrbeck / Frank Edman
2026-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mario Caoile
+0.019better than expected — took 43% of games against 37% expected
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Flores
+0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-02-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mario Caoile
+0.062better than expected — took 65% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Karandeep Kondal
+0.015about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Flores
+0.007about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mario Caoile
+0.007about as expected — took 54% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jim Clerget
+0.010about as expected — took 40% of games against 38% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.