← Search

Clark Cosart

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 61W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Clark Cosart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-07-12 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toni Kidd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-05 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Beilstein mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Jonathan Caplan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · SHC-Cosart · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlin Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-07 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carlin Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-26 · SHC-Cosart · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John McCroskey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-10 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-03 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Caplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chris Eddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-10-19 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Caplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-04 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hector M Salomon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-09-19 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Major
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
75%
6W–2L · 56.8% of games
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 53.7% of games
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 61.7% of games
8.0
56%
14W–11L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
29 matches
#1 Singles
7%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams