← Search

David Finkelman

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 23W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Finkelman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
W
2025-12-06 · IRV-Lux · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-11-16 · IRV-Lux · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · IRV-Lux · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Terence Gariety
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-10-19 · IRV-Lux · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Lux
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Mark King championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-19 · IRV-Strange · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janelle Laurila mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-0
L
2025-04-05 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Porter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2024-12-07 · N OR-IRV-Lux · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Droege
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
N/A
2024-11-16 · N OR-IRV-Lux · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Roger North
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2024-06-02 · IRV-Lux/Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bart Borosky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2024-05-11 · IRV-Lux/Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damon Ogden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2024-04-21 · IRV-Lux/Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willis Boyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2004–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
4.5
23.5%
4W–13L · 41.2% of games
8.0
90%
9W–1L · 58.6% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 59.4% of games
9.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams