← Teams

IRV-Lux/Boyer

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.06 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Tom Lux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Alex Simpson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 4.5
3.80
David Finkelman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.78
Bart Borosky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
—
Rohit Colaco
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Damon Ogden
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Brian Hendrickson
published 4
3.66
John Rake
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Willis Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
Results8 ties
2024-06-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesBart Borosky / Alex Simpson vs Deepak Selvanathan / Brad Wade6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWillis Boyer / John Rake vs Vijay Ranganathan / Shawn Yu6-4, 6-4
2024-06-07Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesBrian Hendrickson / Rohit Colaco vs Scott Eliason / Jeff Lewis5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesWillis Boyer vs Sheng Saechao6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2024-06-02Won 2–1
W#1 SinglesAlex Simpson vs Don Ormsby6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesBart Borosky / David Finkelman vs Jae Joon Kang / Matt Brown6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWillis Boyer / William Malloch vs George Heilig / Chris Eddy3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-05-19Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesTom Lux / Alex Simpson vs David Pham / Stefan Olander6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRohit Colaco vs Jianxun Zhang6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDamon Ogden / Hans George vs Nate Look / Kris Rosenquist7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBrent Grubb / John Rake vs Matt Bolte / Paul Stutzman7-5, 6-2
2024-05-11Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesTom Lux / Alex Simpson vs Gregg Palmer / Zhitong Chen6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRohit Colaco vs Brandon Gross6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWillis Boyer / William Malloch vs Steve Bolstad / Keith Abel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Finkelman / Damon Ogden vs Eric Goldner / Tod Johnston7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-28Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTom Lux / Damon Ogden vs Ernesto Bruce / Michael Lee6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRohit Colaco vs Jeremy Fields6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Rake / William Malloch vs Warren Hill / David Larocca6-4, 6-4
2024-04-21Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesTom Lux / Alex Simpson vs Zhitong Chen / Gregg Palmer6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRohit Colaco vs Eric Goldner6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWillis Boyer / David Finkelman vs Ken Avenoso / Patrick Brewer0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-14Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesTom Lux / Alex Simpson vs Reza Kafi / Robert Torch2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRohit Colaco vs Scott Lenker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrian Hendrickson / Damon Ogden vs Ken Schwerd / John Hall6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesWilliam Malloch / David Finkelman vs Brian McDonagh / Thomas Turnbull6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Tom Lux
75W–45L career
0%90%10%
3.94
4.5
Alex Simpson
34W–53L career
41%59%0%
3.90
4
David Finkelman
23W–32L career
4%91%6%
3.80
4
Bart Borosky
45W–47L career
5%91%5%
3.78
4
Rohit Colaco
27W–13L career
not enough data
—
4
Damon Ogden
87W–84L career
2%98%0%
3.71
4
Brian Hendrickson
23W–50L career
2%97%0%
3.70
4
John Rake
16W–15L career
11%89%0%
3.66
4
Willis Boyer
75W–32L career
7%93%0%
3.64

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.