Search

Willis Boyer

Cascade Locks, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
107 matches · 75W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.65
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 3.5
97%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
OR · 4.0
319 of 498

Willis is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams35 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Willis has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.02019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Willis has gone from the 42nd to the 42nd percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
90%
27W–3L · 62.4% of games
4.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 47.4% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 58.8% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 48.9% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-07-25 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Naugler
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 26% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Chan
+0.000about as expected — took 37% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · IRV-Griffin/Naugler · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Deborah Naugler
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby North
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Morgan Cowling
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · IRV-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brent Grubb
+0.030better than expected — took 48% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · IRV-Johnson · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.022below expectation — took 32% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · IRV-Johnson · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.015about as expected — took 67% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Brian Hughes / Jake Kane
2026-03-29 · IRV-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Gamboa
+0.004about as expected — took 62% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-03-07 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Slavin
+0.014better than expected — took 52% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark King
+0.043better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-02-06 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Wilker
0.003below expectation — took 29% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.