← Search

Jonathan Caplan

Beaverton, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 37W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jonathan Caplan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Garry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Clark Cosart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · SHC-Zielinski · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toni Kidd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · SHC-Young · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sam Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-27 · SHC-Zielinski · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donna Roisom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-03-08 · SHC-Cosart · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Kroloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-18 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marcus Kroloff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-01-03 · SHC-Cosart · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clark Cosart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrea Findley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2025-11-02 · SHC-Beilstein/Hlady · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Toni Kidd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-19 · N OR-SHC-Farrell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clark Cosart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams76 teams · 2005–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
47.5%
19W–21L · 51.8% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.7% of games
8.0mixed
29.7%
11W–26L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer