SHC-Young

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.91 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94

Marcus Kroloff

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.85

Jeroen Swanborn

usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4

3.81

Zach Brehm

usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #2 Mixed Doubles 29% · published 4

—

Jason Crawford

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.70

Maximilian Hey

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.69

Sam Bradshaw

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4

3.67

Pete Stirling

usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4

3.66

Jack Lomax

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.54

Robert Gettle

usually #1 Singles 55%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 3.5

3.54

Jonathan Caplan

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.42

Don Ormsby

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Marcus Kroloff

33W–11L career

0%86%14%

3.94

Jeroen Swanborn

67W–46L career

0%96%4%

3.85

Zach Brehm

10W–2L career · type S

1%98%2%

3.81

Jason Crawford

33W–25L career

not enough data

—

Maximilian Hey

2W–4L career · type S

7%92%1%

3.70

Sam Bradshaw

30W–19L career

5%95%0%

3.69

Pete Stirling

23W–16L career

6%94%0%

3.67

3.5

Jack Lomax

21W–9L career

0%36%64%

3.66

3.5

Robert Gettle

78W–64L career

0%70%30%

3.54

Jonathan Caplan

37W–61L career

25%75%0%

3.54

Don Ormsby

21W–45L career

56%44%0%

3.42

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.