← Search

James Ringelberg

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 73W–77L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Ringelberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-05-17 · IRV-Strange · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby North mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · IRV-Strange · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Libby North mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-15 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Helmer III
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Helmer III
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-03 · IRV-Johnson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Trish Vawter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-26 · NOR-MAC-Henderson · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Helmer III
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · IRV-Boyer · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-14 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-07 · IRV-Boyer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hendrickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Rake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-01-02 · IRV-Boyer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Gamboa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2011–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
62%
31W–19L · 55.3% of games
4.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 39.1% of games
8.0
61.9%
26W–16L · 51.8% of games
9.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.7% of games
8.0mixed
29.6%
8W–19L · 43.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer