Search

Karandeep Kondal

Lacey, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
58 matches · 29W–29L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 4.0
99%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
106 of 364

Karandeep is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Karandeep has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.52019202020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Karandeep has gone from the 16th to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
43.5%
20W–26L · 46.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history58 matches
W
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with William Ligon-Bruno
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
Michael Cheong / Andy To
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicholas Kaloudis
0.011below expectation — took 39% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Varun Verma
0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Josh Thorn / David Tobar
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Christopher Lewis
+0.049better than expected — took 80% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jorge Adamicska
+0.015about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
Chris Heacox / Alisdair Horn
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Varun Verma
+0.023better than expected — took 57% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Varun Verma
+0.024better than expected — took 75% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Jaime Chaves / Brendan Manuel Nadayag
2026-01-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thanh Nguyen
+0.062better than expected — took 62% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
Jung Kim / Florian Purganan
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stuart Wing
+0.005about as expected — took 47% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Eddie Bang / Mark Kadoshima
2025-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Varun Verma
+0.030better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-01-12 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stuart Wing
0.008about as expected — took 48% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Gerardo Mores / Scott Vipond
2025-01-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Loi Crawford
0.059below expectation — took 8% of games against 42% expected
6-0, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.