Search

Jung Kim

Auburn, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
44 matches · 28W–16L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.15
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
3%
down to 4.0
97%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.5
134 of 400

Jung is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jung has been a steady 4.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

4.04.5201920212023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2023 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Jung has gone from the 78th to the 61st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.5
63.6%
21W–12L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history44 matches
L
MIGUEL KIRSTIEN / Dan Graham
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dave McDonald
0.060below expectation — took 29% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Christopher Lewis / Loi Crawford
2026-02-27 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Josh Thorn
0.056below expectation — took 29% of games against 56% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-02-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Piston
0.026below expectation — took 57% of games against 65% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Piston
+0.012better than expected — took 92% of games against 73% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Justin Sleasman / Gerardo Mores
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chan Han
+0.063better than expected — took 86% of games against 50% expected
1-6
W
2025-03-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Piston
0.004about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Karandeep Kondal / Stuart Wing
2025-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Florian Purganan
0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-03-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Florian Purganan
0.016below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Jay Erickson / Cefe Quesada
2025-02-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ham Kang
+0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Florian Purganan
+0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-03-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Piston
0.015below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-03-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Piston
0.031below expectation — took 59% of games against 68% expected
7-5, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.