← Search

Michael Cheong

Tacoma, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
221 matches · 156W–65L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.22
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
100%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Tacoma · 4.5
3 of 12
WA · 4.5
78 of 364

Michael is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Michael has been a steady 4.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

4.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Michael has gone from the 85th to the 87th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
87.5%
84W–12L · 62.6% of games
5.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 61.3% of games
9.0mixed
73.5%
36W–13L · 57% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history221 matches
L
Leah Hampton / Anthony Hamptonchamps
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · with Natalia Devore
−0.013about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Henry Preacher / Erica Leechamps
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Natalia Devore
−0.016below expectation — took 42% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Natalia Devore
+0.022better than expected — took 65% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
Raven Thio / Vincent Linchamps
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Mark Mettler
−0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Bryant Pham / Brent Wilcox
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Yu
−0.016below expectation — took 57% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Paul Yi / Miles Lander
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mettler
−0.027below expectation — took 48% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Jimmy Do / Joshua Do
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Soap Ngeth
+0.006about as expected — took 45% of games against 43% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Robert Lewis / Tam Ly
2026-05-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mettler
−0.021below expectation — took 50% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
Arjun Murthy / Gabriel Ambruso
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mettler
+0.037better than expected — took 72% of games against 53% expected
7-5, 6-0
W
Kevin Kang / Samuel Yuen
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mettler
+0.004better than expected — took 92% of games against 76% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mettler
−0.134about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Jacob Buckley / Pinoe Chu
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Mettler
−0.038below expectation — took 50% of games against 63% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.