← Search

PATRICK TAK

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 74W–26L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add PATRICK TAK to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Netflex and Chill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · Netflex and Chill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · FC-Waldron · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anita Marrero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · Netflex and Chill · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Kang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-06-27 · FC-Waldron · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Anita Marrero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jay Squire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jay Squire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-23 · FC-Li · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexander Tran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · Tak · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · FC-Li · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anthony Enem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-26 · FC-Li · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Squire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-24 · FC-Li · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jay Squire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
72.1%
31W–12L · 59.1% of games
4.0
71.4%
20W–8L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 70.5% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
9%
9 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams