Teams

SWW-STAC-Engle

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 8.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-13vs LRC-HuffmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeonard Bauer / Mark Kadoshima vs Kim Larson / Joel Peyton4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJohn Shelton / Drake Nicholson vs Ronald Beresky / Jeff Laskowski7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Thomas Henderson vs Gary Maciejewski / Tim Smith6-1, 6-1
2026-06-13vs LRC-HuffmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Shelton / Gerald Nelson vs Michael Huffman / Jeff Laskowski6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJeff Engle / David Garratt vs Gary Maciejewski / Joel Peyton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMark Kadoshima / Leonard Bauer vs Clemente Villalobos / John Lindberg6-0, 6-0
2026-06-13vs LRC-HuffmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Kevin Acuff vs Gary Maciejewski / John Lindberg6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCullen Stephenson / Leonard Bauer vs Kim Larson / Clemente Villalobos6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJeff Engle / Michael Williams vs Pete Addison / Joel Peyton2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-06-11vs LRC-HuffmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Kadoshima / Cullen Stephenson vs Ronald Beresky / Clemente Villalobos7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLeonard Bauer / Kevin Acuff vs Jeff Laskowski / John Lindberg6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGerald Nelson / Thomas Henderson vs Gary Maciejewski / Tim Smith6-2, 6-0
2026-06-07vs LRC-HuffmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Thomas Henderson vs Ronald Beresky / Pete Addison6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKurt Bethman / Cullen Stephenson vs Joel Peyton / Jeff Laskowski6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Garratt / Michael Williams vs Kim Larson / John Lindberg6-1, 6-0
2026-05-11vs LRC-HuffmanWon 21
L#1 DoublesGerald Nelson / Drake Nicholson vs Joel Peyton / Gary Maciejewski4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDarrel Leimback / Kevin Acuff vs Ronald Beresky / John Lindberg6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKurt Bethman / John Shelton vs Kim Larson / Pete Addison6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Darrel Leimback
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.97
Mark Kadoshima
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.94
Kurt Bethman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.90
Leonard Bauer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Gerald Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
David Garratt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Drake Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
John Shelton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Cullen Stephenson
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.61
Jeff Engle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.48
Thomas Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Kevin Acuff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Henderson + Leonard Bauer12757% games+13.9% vs expected
John Shelton + Kurt Bethman29763% games+2.1% vs expected
Thomas Henderson + Darrel Leimback12165% games+0.3% vs expected
Drake Nicholson + Jeff Engle4453% games+0.3% vs expected
Jeff Engle + Darrel Leimback7455% games−1.6% vs expected
Jeff Engle + Gerald Nelson6649% games−5.2% vs expected
Drake Nicholson + Gerald Nelson31041% gamesnot enough data
Gerald Nelson + Kurt Bethman6164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Darrel Leimback
129W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
4
Mark Kadoshima
31W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Kurt Bethman
104W–43L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Leonard Bauer
51W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Gerald Nelson
45W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
David Garratt
15W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Drake Nicholson
16W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
John Shelton
100W–53L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Cullen Stephenson
25W–20L career · 11 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Jeff Engle
41W–55L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Thomas Henderson
117W–64L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Kevin Acuff
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Michael Williams
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.