Teams

EDG-oldies but goodies-Hsia

2026 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-11vs NWW-MI-SimsLost 12
L#1 DoublesJim Tjelle / Mikel Morrow vs William Chapman / Charles Naden3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaine Tsujii / Scott Robertson vs Gary Pollastro / Scott Thomson6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Hsia / Michael Ko vs Matthew Rudolf / Gregory Norden2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-02vs HBSQ-AdeeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJim Tjelle / Mikel Morrow vs Kenny Kramer / George Sampson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRaymond Hsia / Lee Schelley vs Gordon Williams / Nicholas Giordano0-6, 2-6
2026-05-19vs HBSQ-AdeeLost 12
W#1 DoublesScott Robertson / Jim Tjelle vs Hal Blumberg / Kenny Kramer6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKamyar Nikzad / Michael Hastings vs Jim Coghlan / Nicholas Giordano2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRaymond Hsia / Michael Ko vs Ray Poletti / Bill Zinck6-7, 5-7
2026-05-12vs BETC-Ikeda 7.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Tjelle / Mikel Morrow vs Steve Ikeda / Mark Weiser6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaine Tsujii / Scott Robertson vs Bruce Colley / Bill Houser2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Ko / Lee Schelley vs Roy Higashi / Tony Shaheen1-6, 4-6
2026-05-04vs CP-Gents-PaulsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaine Tsujii / Scott Robertson vs Erik Gunvaldson / Gregg Watkins4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaul Keller / Jack Young vs Robert Shen / Kent Lundgren4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-04-30vs NWW-MI-SimsLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Keller / Kamyar Nikzad vs Alan Mitchel / Edward la Cava3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLee Schelley / Mikel Morrow vs William Chapman / Charles Naden1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Ko / Scott Robertson vs James Sayre / Mark Sinkey2-6, 3-6
2026-04-23vs TCSP-Phillips 2026Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Tjelle / Mikel Morrow vs Robert Bennett / Howard Shalinsky6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRaymond Hsia / Michael Ko vs Peter Mason / William Brown2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLee Schelley / Michael Hastings vs Bertrand de Boutray / Paul Zemtzov4-6, 2-6
2026-04-15vs BETC-Ikeda 7.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesScott Robertson / Laine Tsujii vs Steve Ikeda / Steven Erickson4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRaymond Hsia / Michael Ko vs Bruce Colley / Bill Houser6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Hastings / Jack Young vs Roy Higashi / Clifford Hopps3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Jim Tjelle
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.64
Laine Tsujii
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.19
Michael Ko
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Michael Hastings
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Lee Schelley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Mikel Morrow
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.04
Jack Young
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Raymond Hsia
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Paul Keller
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.86
Scott Robertson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kamyar Nikzad
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Hastings + Lee Schelley4255% games−5.7% vs expected
Jim Tjelle + Laine Tsujii2545% gamesnot enough data
Michael Hastings + Raymond Hsia314 matchesnot enough data
Lee Schelley + Raymond Hsia224 matchesnot enough data
Paul Keller + Jack Young044 matchesnot enough data
Jim Tjelle + Mikel Morrow314 matchesnot enough data
Scott Robertson + Laine Tsujii134 matchesnot enough data
Raymond Hsia + Michael Ko044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jim Tjelle
68W–61L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Laine Tsujii
29W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Michael Ko
16W–81L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Michael Hastings
23W–19L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Lee Schelley
44W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Mikel Morrow
63W–44L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Jack Young
62W–96L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04
3.5
Raymond Hsia
30W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Paul Keller
30W–51L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Scott Robertson
48W–54L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Kamyar Nikzad
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.