Search

Bruce Seeley

Bellevue, WA
3.5A year-end 2025
143 matches · 80W–63L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
36 of 96
WA · 3.5
497 of 1209

Bruce is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Bruce has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Bruce has gone from the 21st to the 58th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
47.1%
32W–36L · 50.2% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 47.7% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games
6.0mixed
78.8%
26W–7L · 64.4% of games
7.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcia Hood
+0.000about as expected — took 62% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
Kathy Lee / Seth Schwartzmixed
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shubkarman Randhawa
+0.000below expectation — took 43% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Edna Kainz / Dennis Isaacsonmixed
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Hancock
+0.000below expectation — took 32% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carolina DeHaan
+0.000below expectation — took 40% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Rishabh Kale / Tim Ragland
2026-03-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Angelone
+0.042better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Troy Johnson / Jeff Altchech
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Angelone
+0.016better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
Eric Zimbelman / David Kim
2026-01-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Sandwith
0.020below expectation — took 40% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Mihai Petriuc / Ioan Smintina
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Parker
+0.032better than expected — took 61% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Adam Hasson / John Toutonghi
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with C Todd Rentschler
+0.014better than expected — took 62% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Evan Cohn / Michael King
2025-11-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with C Todd Rentschler
+0.089better than expected — took 68% of games against 33% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Meagan Milca / Michael Kastlermixed
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Carolina DeHaan
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Christopher Glassmoyer / Matt Rainey
2025-10-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Bilsborough
+0.025better than expected — took 86% of games against 65% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.