← Search

David Angelone

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 37W–14L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add David Angelone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
W
2026-03-08 · BC-Yeo · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-28 · BC-Yeo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bruce Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-01-24 · BC-Yeo · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sangho Yeo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2025-11-22 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Angelone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-04 · BC-Hancock/Myers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Denise Angelone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-26 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Angelone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-08-09 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Angelone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-02 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Angelone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-06-14 · BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Angelone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-5
W
2025-05-03 · BC-Hitmen-Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-04-25 · BC-Hitmen-Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-04-05 · BC-Hitmen-Smith · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bruce Seeley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
87.5%
21W–3L · 70.7% of games
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 63.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 40.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#1 Singles
10%
5 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe