Teams

BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab

2025 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-09vs CAC/SL-Big Swingers-McCarronWon 20
W#1 DoublesDenise Angelone / David Angelone vs Tracy McCarron / Bret O'Rourke6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBruce Seeley / Karen Vogt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-08-02vs TCSP-Summer Lobbing-GatchecoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDenise Angelone / David Angelone vs Joshua Lee / Edith Laird4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRenee Sedghinasab / Kevin McNeil vs Keiko Aikawa / Prithu Jain3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 DoublesBruce Seeley / Carolina DeHaan vs Elaine Hoy / Randy Barber6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesStephen Waltar / Natalie Banks-Mendez vs Mary Smith / Jeremy Farkas6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLisa Tillman / Kevin McNeil vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-13vs NWW-ETC-Box2Won 21
W#1 DoublesCarolina DeHaan / Bruce Seeley vs Philip Chan / Corinne Dubedat6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLuke Bienfang / Deanne Bilsborough vs Dimitris Voutsas / Christina Ntouniaoglou7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRenee Sedghinasab / Kevin McNeil vs Alexander Moshchuk / Olga Moshchuk2-6, 6-7
2025-06-29vs NWW-BETC-SchillerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeanne Bilsborough / Luke Bienfang vs Blake Pedersen / Amy Yamamoto4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMyoungju Baek / Joseph Holmes vs Roy Higashi / Denise Dubuque5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesStephen Waltar / Natalie Banks-Mendez vs Arthur Nakata / Erin Schiller7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-21vs ETC-Luckyshots-LiWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Tillman / Mark Kroese vs Vikas Bhatia / Rama Karve6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMyoungju Baek / Joseph Holmes vs Ziran Lin / Hongjuan Zhang6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTanya Rizzo / Aaron Koenderman vs WENSI LI / Asako Endo6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDenise Angelone / David Angelone vs Julian Weber / Tove Martin7-6, 3-5
W#2 DoublesRenee Sedghinasab / Kevin McNeil vs Rae Wang / Ben Stickley6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Klutznick / Lisa Tillman vs Jeffrey Hanschmann / Sara Burgess1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings36 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC-The Mixed paiRFection-Elim802315120
2FC-Basha Tennis 6.0802228137
3ETC-Box1 6.0802229120
4MI-Unforced Terrors-Baldwin7117717189
5ETC-Holmgren7115926215
6NWW-BETC-Schiller6116512131
7AYTC-Willgerodt6116515144
8FC-Mora6115616185
9CP-Vintage Volleys-Meyles6216820198
10AYTC-Cross Courts-Cowan Stewart/Wang5213819158
11EDG-Over the EDG-Rochford5215619181
12TCSP-Summer Lobbing-Gatcheco5212922180
13WSC-Old School Slicers-Borner5315921210
14MC-Manickam 6.05315922173
15BC-Doubles2love-Sedghinasab4312919168
16EDG-Mixedologists-Cook44111328209
17BTA-Mixed Signals-Gerard44101432238
18CAC/SL-Ducheane3412922185
19BC-Happy Hitters-Park3481326194
20CAC/SL-Big Swingers-McCarron3491227205
21ETC-Allen34101128214
22CP-Party Mixer-Brodahl35121229206
23PL-Mxd40-Walker35111329201
24BC-Match Point-McCullough/D'Souza35101431225
25AYTC-Busby3581632229
26HBSQ-Collins35101432225
27CP-Mixed Force-Koralska2561533219
28PSC-Dragan26101430219
29BETC-Are You Sure? Ruth2681637259
30FC-It's Not You, It's My Serve-Hoy1661532222
31ETC-Luckyshots-Li1641735231
32HBSQ-Team #1-A-Huff1751939253
33WSC-Dacia-Clinciu1742042253
34RTC-Mixology-Muir1742042268
35TCSP-Buscher0721940231
36PSC-Hive Five-Qin0842042268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
David Angelone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Luke Bienfang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Bruce Seeley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Carolina DeHaan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kevin McNeil
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Denise Angelone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Stephen Waltar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Natalie Banks-Mendez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Matthew Klutznick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Lisa Tillman
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Joseph Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Mark Kroese
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Myoungju Baek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tanya Rizzo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Aaron Koenderman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Karen Vogt
published
2.60
Deanne Bilsborough
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Renee Sedghinasab
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.48
Kathryn Soligon
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deanne Bilsborough + Luke Bienfang5163% games+17.5% vs expected
Mark Kroese + Lisa Tillman9757% games+8.7% vs expected
Joseph Holmes + Myoungju Baek5258% games+2.9% vs expected
Denise Angelone + David Angelone8657% games+1.5% vs expected
Bruce Seeley + Carolina DeHaan10360% games+1.0% vs expected
Renee Sedghinasab + Kevin McNeil182148% games−3.2% vs expected
Stephen Waltar + Natalie Banks-Mendez134 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Klutznick + Lisa Tillman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Angelone
37W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Luke Bienfang
48W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Bruce Seeley
81W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Carolina DeHaan
31W–21L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Kevin McNeil
63W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Denise Angelone
69W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Stephen Waltar
28W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Natalie Banks-Mendez
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Matthew Klutznick
45W–47L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Lisa Tillman
42W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Joseph Holmes
35W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Mark Kroese
40W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Myoungju Baek
52W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Tanya Rizzo
22W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Aaron Koenderman
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
Karen Vogt
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Deanne Bilsborough
40W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Renee Sedghinasab
55W–108L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Kathryn Soligon
36W–49L career · no lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.