Search

Matt Kempf

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
149 matches · 90W–59L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.18
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
1%
stay 3.0
99%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 24% stay · 76% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Lower than today’s 3.18 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
3 of 63
WA · 3.0
35 of 755

Matt is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Matt has been a steady 3.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Matt has gone from the 53rd to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
70.7%
53W–22L · 58.3% of games
3.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 47.8% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history149 matches
L
Brian Johnson / Kathy Kennymixed
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greta Dedmon
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Greta Dedmon
+0.000below expectation — took 46% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kenneth Newton / Cristina Podluskymixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 44% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
Steve Yang / Alex Tan
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hei
0.012below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Sudhir Raman / Deepak Khullar
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hei
+0.034better than expected — took 53% of games against 38% expected
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Derek Coley / Rick Wu
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Hei
+0.012about as expected — took 38% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
Patrick Brem / Ian Brown
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Thomas Hei
0.013below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Ji Zhang / Li Xia
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Scott Robertson
+0.003about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Alex Camara / Thomas Benjamin
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aaron Horton
0.009about as expected — took 40% of games against 45% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Andrew Zarate / Andreas Keodara
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Wilken
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
Jeremy Newton-Smith / Abhishek Singh
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ticson MacH
0.051below expectation — took 48% of games against 65% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Ke Wang / Leo Liu
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ticson MacH
0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.