← Search

Patrick Brem

Clyde Hill, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 53W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patrick Brem to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Ian Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Ian Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-23 · STC-Slammin Salmons-Stroble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ian Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · STC-Slammin Salmons-Stroble · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rob Hendry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-11 · STC-Slammin Salmons-Stroble · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Pigott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
Amol Hanwante / Harry Dong
2026-03-29 · #2 Doubles · with Rob Hendry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · with Ian Brown championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-08 · NWW-STC-Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ian Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-01-31 · NWW-STC-Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matthew Kane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-01-11 · NWW-STC-Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with MIke Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-02 · NWW-STC-Wood · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ian Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Tom Pigott championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
62.7%
32W–19L · 54.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.7% of games
6.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.2% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
26 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal