Search

James Williams

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
69 matches · 23W–46L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.74
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
132 of 144
WA · 3.0
659 of 755

James is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has been 3.0 for all 3 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.0202320252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, James has gone from the 3rd to the 18th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
23.1%
3W–10L · 40.9% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
36.1%
13W–23L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Williams
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Williams
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jamie Williams
+0.000about as expected — took 47% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
Robert Lamoureux / Kathy Redmanmixed
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lisa Williamson
+0.000below expectation — took 8% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Steve Walker / Ellen Owenmixed
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Wilson
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Craighton Goeppele / Thane Liffick
2026-03-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted Kalmus
+0.004about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
Rusty Warnock / Gary Western
2026-02-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Howard Choder
0.056below expectation — took 25% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Chris Burch / Richard Seges
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted Kalmus
+0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Gurmit Singh / Santhosh Bomma
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamil Rich
+0.017about as expected — took 47% of games against 42% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
MIke Wood / Patrick Brem
2026-01-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ted Kalmus
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
Chris Pugh / Gary Gould
2025-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Norman Yee
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Vikas Bhatia / Utsav Prabhu
2025-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mark Puckett
0.014below expectation — took 35% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.