Teams

TCSP-Volley Llamas-Tratt

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 2.96 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs BC-LinLost 02
L#1 DoublesHoward Willson / Jamil Rich vs C Todd Rentschler / Gary Fowler6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Williams / Ted Kalmus vs Craighton Goeppele / Thane Liffick6-7, 3-6
2026-02-28vs AYTC-Tennis St(D)uds-OsbornSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMark Puckett / Eric Fredricksen vs Kenneth Kodama / Jerry Osborn6-0, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJamil Rich vs Charles Moure7-6, 4-0
L#2 DoublesHoward Choder / James Williams vs Rusty Warnock / Gary Western2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Tratt / Ted Kalmus vs Timothy Snow / Ta-Chih Kao2-6, 5-7
2026-02-15vs MC-3.0 Bad Doggies v6-TurnerLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrendan Flynn / Drew Pounds vs Gary Hanada / Victor Hsieh - (DQ)*3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesJamil Rich vs Virak Bun0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYoung Lee / Mark Reudink vs Patrick Lawrence / Sathiya Maripitchai6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAdam Tratt / Patrick Headstrom vs Sundar Ganesh Natarajan / Vijay Byndoor6-3, 6-4
2026-02-01vs NTC-Ball Machine-St De LoreLost 12
L#1 DoublesDrew Pounds / Patrick Headstrom vs Jef St de Lore / James Modie4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMark Puckett / Eric Fredricksen vs Chen Hsu / Chad Carver2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Williams / Ted Kalmus vs Chris Burch / Richard Seges6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-01-25vs ETC-Box 3.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Puckett / Patrick Headstrom vs Philip Chan / Changsung Moon3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesHoward Choder / Eric Fredricksen vs Michael Gauthier / Yeong-Ung Yang2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTed Kalmus / Mark Reudink vs Utsav Prabhu / Ron Benson4-6, 3-6
2026-01-18vs RBW-Long Shots-FerreWon 21
W#1 DoublesYoung Lee / Brendan Flynn vs Tim Flood / Robert Holmgren3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatrick Headstrom / Drew Pounds vs Andy Rivas / John Raffetto6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAdam Tratt / Howard Choder vs Dhiraj Madan / Yusuke Homma0-6, 1-6
2026-01-16vs CAC/SL-TieBreakers-SinghLost 13
L#1 DoublesJay Brennan / Mark Reudink vs Soma Burela / Sai Muppa1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesHoward Willson vs arvind Mallikarjunan0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBrendan Flynn / Ted Kalmus vs Douglas Gordon / Chitradeep Barman1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJamil Rich / James Williams vs Gurmit Singh / Santhosh Bomma0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-01-11vs NWW-STC-WoodLost 13
L#1 DoublesJay Brennan / Mark Reudink vs Chris Jones / Grahm Satterwhite2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBrendan Flynn vs Dan Swanson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Puckett / Eric Fredricksen vs Bryan Syrdal / Mike Anderson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Williams / Ted Kalmus vs MIke Wood / Patrick Brem1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brendan Flynn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Young Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
James Williams
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jamil Rich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.67
Drew Pounds
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Eric Fredricksen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Mark Puckett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.64
Adam Tratt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Jay Brennan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.55
Mark Reudink
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Howard Choder
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Ted Kalmus
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Howard Willson
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Patrick Headstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Tratt + Howard Willson134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Puckett + Eric Fredricksen224 matchesnot enough data
James Williams + Ted Kalmus033 matchesnot enough data
Adam Tratt + Ted Kalmus033 matchesnot enough data
Mark Puckett + Jay Brennan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brendan Flynn
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Young Lee
35W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
James Williams
23W–47L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Jamil Rich
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Drew Pounds
1W–7L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Eric Fredricksen
8W–28L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Mark Puckett
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Adam Tratt
14W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Jay Brennan
14W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Mark Reudink
12W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.55
3
Howard Choder
11W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Ted Kalmus
12W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Howard Willson
8W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Patrick Headstrom
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.