Search

Sathiya Maripitchai

Bothell, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
107 matches · 64W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.05
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
26%
stay 3.0
74%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 71% stay · 29% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.05 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bothell · 3.0
4 of 12
WA · 3.0
167 of 755

Sathiya is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sathiya has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Sathiya has gone from the 52nd to the 49th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
69.3%
52W–23L · 57.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 44% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 49.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history107 matches
W
Xianglong Huang / Jingyuan Yinmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jill LaRosa
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Helen Yamazaki / David Jacobmixed
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bhavanti Manickam
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
Rainie McLaughlin / JEREMY VANBURENmixed
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bhavanti Manickam
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 59% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Zachary Austin / Ajay Radhakrishnan
2026-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig McKernan
0.017below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Kevin Kim / Renxuan Wang
2026-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alvin Sato
+0.006about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Daniel Warren / Jayden Chen
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Turner
0.057below expectation — took 14% of games against 46% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Jason Nguyen / Bao Vu
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Turner
0.048below expectation — took 45% of games against 66% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Xiaobai Zhang / John K Joseph
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Turner
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alvin Sato
0.002about as expected — took 37% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
David White / Blaine Allen
2026-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Turner
+0.112better than expected — took 86% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Ian Brown / Patrick Brem
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patrick Lawrence
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Young Lee / Mark Reudink
2026-02-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patrick Lawrence
+0.010about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.