Search

Mara White

Everett, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
202 matches · 110W–92L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
65%
stay 3.0
35%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 91% stay · 9% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.89. Lower than today’s 2.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Everett · 3.0
4 of 9
WA · 3.0
306 of 755

Mara is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mara has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Mara has gone from the 14th to the 59th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
2.5
75%
27W–9L · 61% of games
3.0
51.5%
51W–48L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
52.7%
29W–26L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history202 matches
L
Kimberly Wong / Amy Wang
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
+0.008better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Joel Higgins / Nicole Lewmixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sundar Ganesh Natarajan
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
+0.064better than expected — took 100% of games against 61% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Stephanie Artati / Jenjira Hellers
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
0.037below expectation — took 42% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
Mark Lewin / Katie Davismixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sundar Ganesh Natarajan
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
Kuniko Jacobson / Christy Chang
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill LaRosa
0.034below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Christie Vandyke / Angela Wangchamps
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · with Mindy Mignogna
+0.013about as expected — took 47% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Huang
+0.014better than expected — took 59% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Kathy Wang / Jessica Le
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Huang
0.011about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
7-5, 6-3
W
Alice Lee / Victoria Chen
2026-05-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Huang
+0.037better than expected — took 71% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
Julia Roast / Upasna Suman
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Huang
+0.033better than expected — took 62% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
Lisa Hagan / Christine Alley Krabakchamps
2026-03-20 · #2 Doubles · with Penny Jay
0.045below expectation — took 32% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.