Search

Joel Higgins

Issaquah, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
188 matches · 102W–86L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
22%
stay 3.0
78%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 67% stay · 33% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.96. Lower than today’s 3.06 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Issaquah · 3.0
3 of 13
WA · 3.0
152 of 755

Joel is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Joel has been 3.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Joel has gone from the 24th to the 70th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
63.8%
51W–29L · 57.1% of games
3.5
26.7%
4W–11L · 43.7% of games
6.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 56.8% of games
6.0mixed
48.2%
27W–29L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history188 matches
W
Sundar Ganesh Natarajan / Mara Whitemixed
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nicole Lew
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Letitia Selk / Hans-peter Kiemmixed
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Higgins
+0.000about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Christie Cabrera / Michael Guthmannmixed
2026-07-12 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Higgins
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Marshall Longtin / Jennifer Longtinmixed
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Higgins
+0.000below expectation — took 14% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Armaan Pandey / Salim Peshawaria
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jack Higgins
+0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Prithu Jain / Mark Moskal
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jack Higgins
+0.033better than expected — took 68% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Michael Ford / Drew Pounds
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ticson MacH
0.018below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Shuo Shang
2026-04-10 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.006better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Xiaoke Wang / Norito Jin
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Fan
0.014about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Hung Nguyen
2026-02-14 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.019about as expected — took 33% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Philip Moberg / Michiel Versteeg
2026-02-06 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vijay Dasari
0.065below expectation — took 20% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Brad Campbell / Mikel Morrow
2026-01-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xianglong Huang
+0.009better than expected — took 64% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 1-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.