← Search

Julia Boneva

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 25W–42L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
72 of 104
WA · 3.0
793 of 1107

Julia is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julia has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julia has gone from the 7th to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
2.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 55% of games
3.0
32.4%
12W–25L · 43.1% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 29.3% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
Amely Wurmbrand
2026-05-26 · #2 Singles · 3.0
−0.030below expectation — took 41% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carmen Pong
+0.037better than expected — took 48% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.025about as expected — took 14% of games against 17% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Emily Doden / Katie Shaw
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Deborah Nevins
+0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.027about as expected — took 14% of games against 16% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Tiffany Buck / Wendy Walker
2026-05-05 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Greenspahn
+0.016better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-04-30 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.009below expectation — took 8% of games against 19% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
Brooke Krekel / Michelle Chattin
2026-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Greenspahn
−0.011below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Lizzie Sherland
2026-04-22 · #2 Singles · 3.0
+0.018better than expected — took 56% of games against 48% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
Gwendolyn Emminger / Sara Wetstone
2026-03-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dayna Wurster
+0.013about as expected — took 29% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Katarina Kueber / Deanne Emmons
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patti Nikaitani
−0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Chandra Pandey / Mary Jean Waite
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Wilkins
−0.023below expectation — took 14% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.