Search

Julita Eleveld

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2024
63 matches · 41W–22L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.17
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 3 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
2%
stay 3.0
98%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 30% stay · 70% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.04. Lower than today’s 3.17 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
11 of 144
WA · 3.0
45 of 755

Julita is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julita has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2021, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julita has gone from the 79th to the 83rd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
68.9%
31W–14L · 59.9% of games
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
Carmen Pong / Julia Boneva
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hagan
0.029below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Naoko Reynolds / Gina Narkunas
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hagan
0.002about as expected — took 33% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tory Frol
0.053below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Galen Sherlock / Sarah Christie
2024-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikhaila Reudink
0.028below expectation — took 59% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
0.015below expectation — took 47% of games against 56% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Stacy Chia / Melissa Jamison
2024-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robin Tarte
0.017below expectation — took 50% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Sandra Schilling / Crystal Moller
2024-04-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Rotival
+0.032better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Stephanie True / Jane Stonecipher
2024-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Watts
+0.035better than expected — took 80% of games against 59% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Watts
0.026below expectation — took 45% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Julie Hansberry / Sangeetha Jagadeesan
2024-03-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Watts
+0.026better than expected — took 92% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Rachel Stroble / Gena Bettin
2023-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hwashing Heyworth
0.003about as expected — took 63% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 4-3
W
Debara Ferleman / Rebecca Buxbaum
2023-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hwashing Heyworth
0.007better than expected — took 75% of games against 69% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.