← Search

Julie Hansberry

Redmond, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
135 matches · 32W–103L · seasons 2020–2026
Where Julie sits
123
2.5
1173
3.0
1525
3.5
1013
4.0
423
4.5
66
5.0

Julie is one of 1173 women at 3.0 in this cohort of 4323. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 30% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Julie has gone from the 17th to the 25th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
40.9%
18W–26L · 43.6% of games
3.5
4.5%
2W–42L · 24.2% of games
6.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 37.1% of games
7.0
22.7%
5W–17L · 38.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.8% of games
7.0mixed
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history135 matches
L
2025-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elena Ivanova
−0.014below expectation — took 8% of games against 28% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristen Mosebar
+0.064better than expected — took 40% of games against 20% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Paige Jensen / Ashleigh Walls
2025-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shoshanna Wilbur
+0.036better than expected — took 75% of games against 55% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Rae Smith
−0.005below expectation — took 14% of games against 28% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.005about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xiaobei Li
−0.031below expectation — took 14% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-04-29 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leilani Caldwell
−0.059below expectation — took 20% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.012about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Caitlin Harris / Darla Paget
2025-04-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Montgomery
−0.005about as expected — took 60% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
Heather Curtis / Jennifer Andrews
2025-04-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.034better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W
Christine Morgan / Angie Kennedy
2025-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shoshanna Wilbur
−0.008about as expected — took 55% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Brendalen Hutchinson / Rutchel Lois Abella
2025-04-10 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Rae Smith
+0.005below expectation — took 20% of games against 29% expected
6-3, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.