Search

Wanda Garfield

Woodway, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
96 matches · 43W–53L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.72
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 10 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
673 of 755

Wanda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Wanda has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
0.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.4% of games
3.0
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.6% of games
6.0
20%
1W–4L · 47.6% of games
7.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 50.2% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
18W–16L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history96 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Bradley
+0.000below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Wendy Champagne / Laurent Bellangemixed
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samuel Bradley
+0.000about as expected — took 68% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Leah Vitcovich
+0.004below expectation — took 25% of games against 31% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Mary Adkins / Grace Drone
2026-05-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Santos
0.028below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Carrie Priebe / Diane Othman
2026-05-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maria Santos
0.001about as expected — took 44% of games against 44% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-13 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Burdyshaw
0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Momcilovich
0.008below expectation — took 8% of games against 25% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Jodi Dansereau / Mitzi Fritz
2026-04-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sara Kuhl
0.011below expectation — took 14% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Lauren Getty / Vivek Devimixed
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rakesh Mallela
+0.000about as expected — took 45% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-13 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rakesh Mallela
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-07-25 · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lee Darrow
0.052below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Matt Topping / Anne Salvinomixed
2025-07-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Don Robey
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.