← Search

Denise Chen

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
106 matches · 76W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.48
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
58%
stay 3.5
42%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 88% stay · 12% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.41. Lower than today’s 3.48 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
9 of 63
WA · 3.5
107 of 1209

Denise is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Denise has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Denise has gone from the 89th to the 72nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.8% of games
3.5
80.5%
33W–8L · 60.9% of games
7.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 70% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 43.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history106 matches
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Huang
−0.027below expectation — took 40% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Jessica Closson / Dayna Wurster
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
+0.010better than expected — took 60% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann McGovern
−0.046below expectation — took 46% of games against 63% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jodi Merrywell / Sara Shelton
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emer Hensey
+0.018better than expected — took 80% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Hong Vo / Gwendolyn Emminger
2026-04-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Huang
+0.057better than expected — took 75% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Perks
−0.010about as expected — took 46% of games against 50% expected
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
Christa Eadson / Katrina Miller
2026-02-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Perks
−0.005about as expected — took 43% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Kelly
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Brenda Kim / Xue Song
2026-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Perks
+0.028better than expected — took 72% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-12-07 · #2 Doubles · with Naomi Knight
−0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
Amy Enns-Ford / Erica Wiecherschamps
2025-12-06 · #2 Doubles · with Naomi Knight
−0.025below expectation — took 52% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Helen Kelly
+0.016better than expected — took 75% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.