← Search

Amy Rotival

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 69W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Rotival to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-3
W
2026-08-03 · Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Alley Krabak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-28 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-26 · TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-07 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-28 · TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christine Alley Krabak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-23 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-08 · TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-04-02 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
68.8%
55W–25L · 55.2% of games
3.5
30.8%
4W–9L · 49.5% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 53.6% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 32.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
25 matches
#2 Singles
13%
16 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#1 Female Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams