Search

Beth Goodman

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
98 matches · 58W–40L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.14
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.0
96%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 3.5
56 of 63
WA · 3.5
1009 of 1209

Beth is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Beth has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Beth has gone from the 41st to the 16th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.6% of games
3.5
56.8%
25W–19L · 49% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
8W–8L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history98 matches
L
Sarah Jaquet / Heather Lorge
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Chatalas
0.051below expectation — took 35% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 6-2
W
Laura Rochford / Emily Greenspahn
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Chatalas
+0.007about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Joyce
0.052below expectation — took 44% of games against 66% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Courtney Williams / Christine Holm
2026-03-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Chatalas
+0.017about as expected — took 48% of games against 43% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Lyndsey Gillis / Sella Subramanian
2025-07-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Perret
0.005below expectation — took 25% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Perret
0.015about as expected — took 52% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Chatalas
+0.008better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Chatalas
+0.024better than expected — took 53% of games against 43% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Nancy Edwards / Holly Ng
2025-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janine Perret
+0.003about as expected — took 53% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erika Brown
0.009below expectation — took 28% of games against 37% expected
7-5, 6-0
L
2025-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrea Chatalas
0.009below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-05-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Boucher
0.056below expectation — took 14% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.