Search

Allie Wood

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
67 matches · 32W–35L · seasons 20222026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.79
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
100%
stay 3.0
0%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
167 of 213
WA · 3.0
721 of 960

Allie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Allie has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Allie has gone from the 25th to the 28th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
2.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
51.1%
23W–22L · 50.9% of games
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 39.1% of games
6.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 48.3% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history67 matches
L
Simran Desai / Trina Nguyen
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Miller
0.021below expectation — took 48% of games against 56% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Nancy Edwards / Pamela King
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Rotival
0.015below expectation — took 52% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.012below expectation — took 14% of games against 31% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
Maria McBride / Catherine Nielsen
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Olason
0.010about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liesl Langley
+0.007below expectation — took 20% of games against 28% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Nikki Watrous / Laura Schultink
2026-05-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Day
0.032below expectation — took 37% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Wendy Walker / Carla Johnson
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liesl Langley
+0.052better than expected — took 53% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Karin Loen / Shelley Buhler
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Christie
+0.013better than expected — took 67% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Janet Chee
2026-05-14 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.032better than expected — took 57% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Kate Goodman / Carrie Priebe
2026-05-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Olason
+0.032better than expected — took 62% of games against 47% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Rotival
0.042below expectation — took 14% of games against 40% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Amy Friedland / TESSA GORMAN
2026-02-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mayumi Willgerodt
0.027below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.