← Search

Catherine Day

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 71W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Day to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-07-26 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-10 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matthew Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-26 · TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allie Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-14 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tory Frol
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-5
L
2026-04-28 · TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Galen Sherlock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-04-16 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-14 · TCSP-Smash Girls-Miller · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Dorling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-02 · TCSP-Heyworth/Tonkin · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.5%
40W–25L · 55.1% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.7% of games
6.0
75%
3W–1L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
70.6%
12W–5L · 57.8% of games
7.0mixed
32.3%
10W–21L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
26 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams