← Search

Melanie Fix

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
153 matches · 82W–71L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 23 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
64%
stay 3.0
36%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.90. Lower than today’s 2.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
68 of 144
WA · 3.0
303 of 755

Melanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melanie has been 3.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Melanie has gone from the 26th to the 35th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
61.4%
62W–39L · 56.3% of games
3.5
34.5%
10W–19L · 44.2% of games
6.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.5% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 57.9% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history153 matches
L
Jolanta Grigsby / Bianca Marcu
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Vogel
−0.044below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Celia Evans / Mary Battison
2026-05-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rena Behar
−0.035below expectation — took 20% of games against 41% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
Sarah Parrilla / Monika Sharma
2026-05-16 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Arlene Flor
−0.015below expectation — took 43% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Catherine Day / Tory Frol
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Kelly
+0.023better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 5-0
W
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susanne Wagner-Fischer
−0.001about as expected — took 55% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Adina Friedman / Jen Waldher
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susanne Wagner-Fischer
−0.005below expectation — took 35% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-1
W
Anca Zaharia / Iuliana Marinov
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Johansen
+0.063better than expected — took 100% of games against 62% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
Denise Angelone / Andreanna Kapogiannatos
2026-04-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rena Behar
−0.004about as expected — took 47% of games against 49% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sasha Tanji / Chunchun Tong
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Johnson
+0.024better than expected — took 50% of games against 42% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Shumei Lin / Holly Moraca
2026-04-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Jerez
−0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Johnson
−0.019below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
Rachel Stroble / Jacqueline True
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erika Johansen
−0.028below expectation — took 41% of games against 54% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.