Search

Katie Watts

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
60 matches · 28W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 5 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
34%
down to 3.0
66%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 20% down · 80% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.07. Higher than today’s 3.03 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
303 of 311
WA · 3.5
1321 of 1364

Katie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Katie has gone from the 13th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
58.8%
20W–14L · 56.5% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.2% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history60 matches
L
Katrina Miller / Mila Niset
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
+0.023better than expected — took 40% of games against 34% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Linda Myhrvold / Jen Waldher
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
+0.017better than expected — took 58% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
0.007about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Victoria Huang / Beth Flume
2026-04-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Turner
+0.021better than expected — took 48% of games against 39% expected
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
0.014below expectation — took 45% of games against 51% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sherri Johnson
+0.032better than expected — took 53% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
0.001about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
Katie Misiewicz / Mary Fitzgerald
2025-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hwashing Heyworth
0.018below expectation — took 37% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Ann Kaill / Mari Moline
2025-05-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
+0.018better than expected — took 52% of games against 45% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Stutz
+0.013about as expected — took 41% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Day
+0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 27% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Katherine Markert / Amanda Drescher
2024-08-14 · #1 Female Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Tonkin
+0.008about as expected — took 57% of games against 53% expected
4-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.