Search

Julie Stutz

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
35 matches · 14W–21L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.06
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 4 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
23%
down to 3.0
77%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.09. Higher than today’s 3.06 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
321 of 342
WA · 3.5
1365 of 1460

Julie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Julie has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2023, 2026 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Julie has gone from the 20th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2025.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level1 levels played
3.5
41.2%
14W–20L · 44% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history35 matches
W
Sarah Jaquet / Heather Lorge
2026-05-28 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annabella Chiocco
+0.001about as expected — took 45% of games against 47% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Shelton
+0.003about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Jhu
0.009below expectation — took 38% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Andrews
0.067below expectation — took 14% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
Zarlasht Toner / Monna Maddy
2025-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaycee Barrett
+0.060better than expected — took 67% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Watts
+0.025better than expected — took 41% of games against 34% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
Rachel Blake / Jennifer Harris
2025-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Rotival
+0.033better than expected — took 33% of games against 27% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tory Frol
+0.006about as expected — took 40% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-02-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Tonkin
0.020below expectation — took 52% of games against 60% expected
7-6, 4-4
L
2025-01-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Winkelhake
0.010below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2024-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Rotival
0.028below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Jacki Malitzski / Kristan Weller
2024-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Thompson
+0.031better than expected — took 80% of games against 60% expected
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.