← Search

Melissa Igel

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 25W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Melissa Igel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-06-04 · AYTC-Skort-Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Zuberec
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-28 · AYTC-Skort-Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · AYTC-Skort-Knobbs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rena Behar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · AYTC-Skort-Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-09 · AYTC-Skort-Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Schmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-19 · AYTC (Daytime) Schmid/Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Ziegler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · AYTC (Daytime) Schmid/Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-29 · AYTC (Daytime) Schmid/Knobbs · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Stafford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-01-19 · AYTC (Daytime) Schmid/Knobbs · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-04-24 · AYTC-Chow/Stafford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-04-10 · AYTC-Chow/Stafford · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-03-27 · AYTC-Chow/Stafford · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Chow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.1% of games
3.5
27.9%
12W–31L · 41% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams