Search

Melissa Igel

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
68 matches · 25W–43L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
232 of 256
WA · 3.5
1062 of 1209

Melissa is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has been a steady 3.5 across all 7 seasons on record.

3.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Melissa has gone from the 27th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.1% of games
3.5
27.9%
12W–31L · 41% of games
6.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 49.4% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 43.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history68 matches
W
Becky Jhu / Terriko Somers
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Zuberec
+0.073better than expected — took 71% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Gwendolyn Emminger / Sara Wetstone
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Stafford
0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Katie Watts / Hwashing Heyworth
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rena Behar
+0.010about as expected — took 48% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Lee
0.027below expectation — took 32% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Stephanie Gauthier / Rebecca Feyerick
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Schmid
0.020below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Heidi Stribley / Anne McGee
2026-02-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Ziegler
+0.020better than expected — took 47% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Stafford
0.014below expectation — took 20% of games against 34% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Sue Vrana / Claudette Krause
2026-01-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy Stafford
+0.051better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
Gwendolyn Emminger / Erika Walther
2026-01-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Clark
0.010below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Elizabeth Kain / Robin Kellogg
2025-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Kim
+0.037better than expected — took 62% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2025-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Holt
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
Jennifer Johnson / Annika Andrews
2025-03-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Chow
0.017below expectation — took 29% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.