Search

Ticson MacH

Bellevue, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
192 matches · 114W–78L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
34%
stay 3.0
66%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 77% stay · 23% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.94. Lower than today’s 3.03 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.0
19 of 63
WA · 3.0
191 of 755

Ticson is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Ticson has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

2.53.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Ticson has gone from the 10th to the 22nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
65.3%
32W–17L · 57.7% of games
3.5
41.9%
13W–18L · 44.3% of games
6.0
100%
5W–0L · 66% of games
6.0mixed
64.2%
34W–19L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
57.4%
27W–20L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history192 matches
W
Nan Li / Zhe Wangmixed
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizaveta Hermann
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 48% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
Kumar Bhat / Annelise Sullivanmixed
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tingting Zheng
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nelly Ketefian
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Joe Zhou / Zhikai Cui
2026-05-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ming Fan
0.020below expectation — took 41% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Timothy Lam / Jeff Au-Yeung
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vijay Dasari
+0.052better than expected — took 67% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Michael Ford / Drew Pounds
2026-04-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joel Higgins
0.018below expectation — took 56% of games against 62% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Steve Lin / Mark Kroese
2026-04-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Darren Carrido
+0.036better than expected — took 80% of games against 58% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Jeremy Newton-Smith / Abhishek Singh
2026-03-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Kempf
0.051below expectation — took 48% of games against 65% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Ke Wang / Leo Liu
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Kempf
0.008about as expected — took 47% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Brad Smith / Scott Manning
2026-03-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Matt Kempf
+0.038better than expected — took 100% of games against 69% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allan Yeung
0.026below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Charlie Mills / Douglas Hawkins
2026-03-08 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allan Yeung
+0.068better than expected — took 71% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.