Search

Jill LaRosa

Marysville, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
231 matches · 137W–94L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.85
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 32 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
97%
stay 3.0
3%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.80. Lower than today’s 2.85 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 3.0
506 of 755

Jill is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jill has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jill has gone from the 11th to the 64th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
2.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 62.5% of games
3.0
50.5%
53W–52L · 49.8% of games
6.0
75.9%
22W–7L · 58.1% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66%
33W–17L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history231 matches
L
Kelly Silver / Heidi Relyea
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
0.033below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
7-5, 7-6
L
Kimberly Wong / Amy Wang
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara White
+0.008better than expected — took 55% of games against 49% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Xianglong Huang / Jingyuan Yinmixed
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sathiya Maripitchai
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Seiko Kobayashi / Chris Pratleymixed
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ramon Calpe
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Linda Zuckerman / Steve Schlemmermixed
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Randy Barber
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Turner
+0.017better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
William Barks / Natalie Matthewsmixed
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ramon Calpe
+0.000better than expected — took 86% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
Kuniko Jacobson / Christy Chang
2026-06-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mara White
0.034below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
Julie Martin / Naomi O'Learychamps
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · with Debbie Schrock
+0.013about as expected — took 45% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Meg Viera / Rebecca Zimmer
2026-05-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Nelson
+0.035better than expected — took 71% of games against 52% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Allison Lieb / Sri Ramya Dandu
2026-05-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Penny Jay
0.028below expectation — took 44% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Angela Lewis / Joycelyn Su
2026-04-24 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Schrock
+0.013better than expected — took 65% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.