← Search

David Bibbs

Everett, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
132 matches · 54W–78L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 17 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
47%
down to 3.5
53%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 28% down · 72% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.55. Higher than today’s 3.51 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Everett · 4.0
8 of 8
WA · 4.0
710 of 782

David is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

David has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, David has gone from the 35th to the 31st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
48.1%
25W–27L · 51% of games
4.5
22.7%
5W–17L · 36.1% of games
8.0
80%
4W–1L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
16W–16L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history132 matches
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Bibbs
+0.000below expectation — took 39% of games against 46% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Bibbs
+0.000better than expected — took 42% of games against 35% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristin Bibbs
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
Erin Shigaki / Jeffrey Haesslermixed
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tonee Rockwell
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Brendan Peters / Susanne Neupauermixed
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tonee Rockwell
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Ronan Brown / Chris Chau
2026-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Schmidt
+0.013better than expected — took 59% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lohit Verma
+0.019better than expected — took 75% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Daniel Song / Eliot Tong
2026-05-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bindu Purhar
−0.031below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
YUTARO SAKAI / Charlie Gartenberg
2026-03-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Xu
−0.015below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-02-28 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Schmidt
−0.032below expectation — took 20% of games against 40% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Schmidt
−0.034below expectation — took 45% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chad Masche
−0.013about as expected — took 71% of games against 69% expected
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.