← Search

Melanie Korch

Edmonds, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
190 matches · 79W–111L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.37
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
94%
stay 3.5
6%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 99% stay · 1% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.32. Lower than today’s 3.37 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Edmonds · 3.5
7 of 16
WA · 3.5
363 of 1209

Melanie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melanie has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.03.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 7.0, Melanie has gone from the 22nd to the 54th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
72.2%
13W–5L · 58.6% of games
4.0
22.7%
10W–34L · 41.8% of games
7.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 51.1% of games
8.0
45.1%
23W–28L · 47.5% of games
7.0mixed
36.4%
8W–14L · 45% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history190 matches
L
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caleb Blum
+0.000below expectation — took 33% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Cindy Woods / Kellie Saville
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 41% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
Lori Abbott / Nancy Trangmoe
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.019better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · with Kimberly Dirksen
−0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · #1 Doubles · with Sue Thompson
+0.003about as expected — took 56% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.014better than expected — took 75% of games against 63% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Evelyn Yu
−0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
+0.023better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-21 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Meyer
−0.021below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Yogita MANGHNANI / Michelle Weijia Cai
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Santos
−0.029below expectation — took 20% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Meyer
−0.010below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
Ethel Brende / Nan Myers
2026-05-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Dirksen
−0.032below expectation — took 38% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.