Teams

Wide Open Aces

2026 USTA Adult 55 & Over · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over

10 players · average NTRP 3.45 / MONTANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-28vs Get A GripLost 12
W#1 DoublesTina Ovnic / Annelise Torgerson vs Shannon Johnson / Debbie Meyer6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelanie Korch / Kimberly Dirksen vs Cindy Woods / Kellie Saville7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesArianna Whitman / Suzanne Taylor vs Terry Perkins / Ruby Graham6-7, 0-6
2026-06-27vs Tightly StrungLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Korch / Kimberly Dirksen vs Lori Abbott / Nancy Trangmoe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTina Ovnic / Annelise Torgerson vs Laura Rembe / Elizabeth Suh4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeeDee Schubert / Heather Curtis vs Sandrah MacK / Terri Nickless6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-27vs Get A GripWon 21
L#1 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Suzanne Taylor vs Ruby Graham / Terry Perkins1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesTina Ovnic / Annelise Torgerson vs Kellie Saville / Cindy Woods6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHwayun Lee / DeeDee Schubert vs Janice Schenk / Debbie Meyer6-2, 7-5
2026-06-26vs Twisted SistersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDeeDee Schubert / Hwayun Lee vs Jan Schweitzer / Laurel Farrell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesArianna Whitman / Heather Curtis vs Jane Selvig / Karen Spierling6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDIANA RAIMONDO / Suzanne Taylor vs Julie Birgenheier / Sally Lentz6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 7.0 - 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wide Open Aces22661398
2Twisted Sisters0411122141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
DeeDee Schubert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Annelise Torgerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Melanie Korch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Hwayun Lee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Tina Ovnic
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
DIANA RAIMONDO
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Kimberly Dirksen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Suzanne Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Heather Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.04
Arianna Whitman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Taylor + DIANA RAIMONDO5259% games+8.5% vs expected
Kimberly Dirksen + Melanie Korch3452% games+4.7% vs expected
DIANA RAIMONDO + Arianna Whitman5554% games+2.9% vs expected
Suzanne Taylor + Tina Ovnic12751% games−2.2% vs expected
DIANA RAIMONDO + Tina Ovnic5552% games−2.3% vs expected
Heather Curtis + Arianna Whitman15555% games−4.4% vs expected
Tina Ovnic + Annelise Torgerson4356% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Taylor + Annelise Torgerson3355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
DeeDee Schubert
89W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Annelise Torgerson
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
3.5
Melanie Korch
79W–111L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Hwayun Lee
96W–92L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Tina Ovnic
34W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
DIANA RAIMONDO
39W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Kimberly Dirksen
117W–192L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Suzanne Taylor
43W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Heather Curtis
70W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Arianna Whitman
58W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.