← Search

Lohit Verma

Bothell, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 100W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lohit Verma to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
L
2026-06-07 · CAC/SL-Dhindsa · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-05 · CAC/SL-Verma · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Lam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-0
L
2026-05-30 · CAC/SL-Dhindsa · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Simran Dhindsa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · CAC/SL-Verma · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Schmidt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-05-09 · CAC/SL-Verma · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Bibbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · CAC/SL-Verma · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Blanchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · CAC/SL-Verma · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rohit Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
Ramji Beera / Amit Wadhwa
2026-04-05 · CAC/SL-Verma · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rohit Sharma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-03-14 · CAC/SL-Dhindsa · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Zeke Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-03-07 · CAC/SL-Dhindsa · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victor Betancourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · CAC/SL-Dhindsa · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Victor Betancourt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-1
W
2026-02-20 · SWW-JTC-White · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Will Blanchard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
100%
4W–0L · 71% of games
4.0
69.9%
58W–25L · 59.5% of games
4.5
46.9%
15W–17L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
69.2%
18W–8L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#2 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova